Built by Araadh · Age 15 · Chandigarh, India
Researca reads 20+ academic papers, ranks them by actual relevance, and synthesizes findings where every claim links to its source.
No credit card · 25 free searches to start
See it work
| Paper | Methodology | Key Finding | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRISPR-Cas9 enables precise genome editing2023 | In vivo mouse model, n = 47 | 94% on-target efficiency achieved | Long-term immune response unstudied |
| Off-target effects in therapeutic CRISPR2023 | Whole genome sequencing, 12 cell lines | 3.2% off-target rate in non-dividing cells | Clinical trial data absent |
| Base editing vs prime editing comparison2022 | Systematic review, 34 studies | Prime editing superior for point mutations | No head-to-head RCT exists |
| CRISPR delivery mechanisms: viral vs non-viral2023 | Meta-analysis, 28 trials | LNP delivery matches AAV efficiency | Long-term expression data lacking |
Synthesis
Papers 2 and 3 directly contradict on efficiency metrics. No study in this set addresses long-term immune response — this represents a critical gap in the literature.
Papers ranked by what matters to your query, not how often they've been cited.
Finds contradictions and gaps across the full set — the analysis a researcher actually needs.
Every claim links to its source — open the paper and check it yourself. No invented citations, ever.
I was writing a research paper on prosthetic arms at 15. Every tool either hallucinated citations or made me read 30 papers manually. So I built the one I needed.
— Araadh Singh, Founder & Builder
$12 / month· $96/yr
Students and researchers in developing countries — email araadh3111@gmail.com for a discount.